Massachusetts is home to Boston, one of the major sites of revolutionary battles in our nation’s history. In November 2016, it claimed victory in another revolutionary battle, joining Maine as the first two east coast states to legalize recreational cannabis.
The Massachusetts Marijuana Legalization Initiative (Question 4) passed with 54 percent of the vote. It allows individuals age 21 and older to possess up to an ounce in public and 10 ounces in their homes, grow up to six plants and give another person of legal age up to an ounce.
Despite voter approval for legalization, the state government already delayed the enactment of the initiative, and now it apparently wants to gut it. Per the Boston Globe, proposed changes include "sharply increasing the marijuana tax rate, lowering the 12-plant-per-household limit on home growing pot, and even raising the legal age for purchase, possession, and use up from 21," among other prohibitionist moves. The governor has two state lawmakers rewriting the law entirely and wants it on his desk by June. This anti-democratic move does not look good, but hopefully the voters will push the state government to do the right thing.
“States with regulated marijuana access tend to have lower rates of opiate overdoses,” said Patrick Heinz, a retired Substance Abuse Counselor and Corrections Officer who now works with Law Enforcement Action Partnership (LEAP). “I think we’re going to greatly reduce the pain and suffering of people in Massachusetts, particularly those with opioid addiction and their families. The new tax revenue from marijuana will help us provide better and more accessible drug treatment.”
The fight to pass the November initiative was fierce: Right-wing casino mogul Sheldon Adelson contributed a million dollars to defeat the measure, while the Boston Archdiocese (of decades-long child rape and cover-up fame) ponied up $850,000.Many state and local politicians from both parties opposed the bill, which is not surprising since the Cambridge and Kendall Square area alone is home to more than 100 pharmaceutical companies, making Cambridge-Boston the number one Big Pharma hub in the nation. Republican Governor Charlie Baker and Democratic Mayor Martin Walsh of Boston both opposed legalization while hypocritically supporting the expansion of alcohol sales.
Conversely, the editorial board of the Harvard Crimson endorsed legalization, and a survey of Harvard undergraduates found a 67- to 16-percent advantage in favor of Question 4. Poll numbers in late spring and early summer made it appear Question 4 would fail, but the measure gradually gained more and more support.
The need to fight prohibition in Massachusetts through a ballot measure was epitomized by the fight for medical cannabis (MMJ). Though 63 percent of the state’s population voted to legalize cannabis for medical use in 2012, the government of Massachusetts was painstakingly slow in implementing that law, making it confusing and sometimes deadly for those who required the medical benefits of MMJ. In the three years after the legislation passed, it was nearly impossible for dispensaries to receive licenses to open, and the harsh regulations for approving cannabis for medical use was so intense that, if applied to the produce in most grocery stores, they too would fail to pass the test.
These regulations also caused confusion on both sides of the MMJ battle—those who require it and those who provide it. People were fined and arrested with cannabis in their possession even when they had a signed doctor’s prescription under the original implementation of the law. However, in December 2014, a dispensary was approved for cultivation, and in June of 2015, the first MMJ dispensary opened in Salem. Deval Patrick, the governor when the initiative passed, seriously dragged his heels on implementation, but changes to the system have helped speed up the process in the past year.
“This change creates a more streamlined, efficient and transparent process that allows the Commonwealth to maintain the highest standards of both public safety and accessibility,” said Dr. Monica Bharel, the state’s public health commissioner.
Patients requiring MMJ need to apply for an ID card, but this ID card may not protect all patients, even with full legalization. It is still a federal offense to travel with a “drug” across American waters. So those wishing to visit Nantucket or Martha’s Vineyard with medicine can have it confiscated, even if they have an ID card. This is something that could impact not only tourism but also the people who live on the islands—many of whom are older retirees who may suffer from alignments like cancer.
"No matter how many states do it, we are still going to have some of these weird loopholes that people fall into," said Christopher Brown, spokesman for the Washington, D.C.-based Americans for Safe Access, discussing the situation in Massachusetts.
Still, with the state legalizing recreational cannabis, the government will have a more difficult time enforcing its anti-democratic prohibitions.
Photo credit: Unsplash.