Football Addiction Is More Serious Than You Might Think

By David Jenison on August 23, 2018

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) is a classification guide used around the world since the 1950s. The fifth edition (introduced in 2013) puts both Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) and Non-Substance-Related Disorders (or behavioral addictions) in the same category, and the latter group includes addictions to gambling, internet gaming, shopping, social media and other activities. For certain individuals, these behaviors produce euphoric dopamine spikes that can involve "the same consequences brought about by addiction to alcohol and drugs." 

DSM-5 did not fully define the criteria for behavioral addictions, but medical professionals diagnose SUDs by checking to see if the patient in the past year meets two or more of the following criteria:

  • Hazardous use
  • Social/interpersonal problems related to use
  • Neglected major roles to use
  • Withdrawal
  • Tolerance
  • Used larger amounts/longer
  • Repeated attempts to quit/control use
  • Much time spent using
  • Physical/psychological problems related to use
  • Activities given up to use

By applying the SUD criteria to avid fans of football (American or European style), one might argue that many meet the diagnostic criteria for a non-substance addictive disorder. Consider the following: 

Hazardous use: Do you check scores and fantasy football stats on your phone while driving? Do you engage in excessive alcohol consumption on game day?

Social/interpersonal problems related to use: Does daylong football-watching sessions stress out your husband or wife (your wife) more than your devotion to superhero movies? 

Neglected major roles to use: Do you leave work early for games or secretly stream them at the office? Have you lied to your significant other to watch a game? Were you late picking up your kids because a game went into overtime? 

Withdrawal: Do you feel antsy when the season ends, or do you regularly recount games that happened years ago?  

Tolerance: Do you need to watch more football to experience the same satisfaction as before? 

Used larger amounts/longer: Is one game per week no longer enough? Are you now watching multiple teams, both college and pro? 

Repeated attempts to quit/control use: Does anxiety build if you're unable to watch a game, place a bet, check scores or participate in fantasy leagues? Have you broken promises regarding viewing habits?

Much time spent using: Do you watch several games per week as well as Inside the NFL and every Dancing with the Stars episode with Terrell Owens? 

Physical/psychological problems related to use: Do you feel depressed when your team loses or misses the playoffs? Are you gaining unhealthy amounts of weight by downing nacho bowls and piss beer watching games from your recliner? 

Activities given up to use: Do you regularly turn down social invites because you want to watch football in real time and not from the DVR? Are activities cut from your daily life once the NFL season starts? 

Per the DSM-5, a person need only meet two criteria for a SUD diagnosis. This might seem like a low bar—hence a third of all cannabis users meet the diagnostic criteria for addiction—but many hardcore football fans meet the same criteria listed above. This suggests football-use (FU) disorder is as serious an issue as cannabis. 

Consider the risks. Checking scores on your phone while driving is more dangerous than driving stoned, and football is a gateway behavior to alcohol abuse, intoxicated violence, gambling addiction, anthem kneeling and, for those who play the game, opioid abuse and traumatic head injuries. FU disorder also correlates with racism and violence. A 2016 study in International Review for the Sociology of Sport found that "eighty-three percent of the [survey] participants stated that racism remains culturally embedded," while a 1998 study found that "groups of young male fans… challenge the assumption that violence is wholly central to the match-day experience." Based on the outfits and antics seen at stadiums, correlations also exist between football and eating disorders, tic disorders and psychosis. 

"What if I simply watch one game per week in the privacy of my own home?" a football fan might ask. America cannot allow it. As with cannabis, politicians cannot take the risk that your casual FU turns into a full-scale FU disorder that burdens society and puts children at risk. Plus, there are biblical issues with turning QBs into false gods and creating symbols that honor man over God, for as Leviticus 19:4 admonishes, "Do not go after false gods, and do not make metal images of gods for yourself." The Lombardi Trophy, of course, is forged from precious metal and idolized by many. 

How should politicians respond? 

In theory, the government could simply assist with treatment options for those who develop an FU disorder, but to stay consistent with American values, the government should use cannabis prohibition as a blueprint to shut down the National Football League and roll out FU Prohibition. This means watching, playing or selling access to football games would become a crime punishable by fines and mandatory-minimum prison sentences. FU prohibition should include bans on paraphernalia like team jerseys, posters, footballs and branded beer koozies.  

Offenders should also be subject to the same civil forfeiture laws as cannabis. So if a SWAT team shoots your dog and smashes through the front door to find you watching the Cleveland Browns playing in Amsterdam, law enforcement can confiscate your flat-screen television, computers, six-packs and whatever else they deem associated with the crime, even if they don't charge you with a crime. As with cannabis, civil forfeiture will motivate policing for profit, but Trump endorses it, and Jeff Sessions is supercharging it, so it must be a good idea, right? Revenue generated from civil forfeiture and fines—along with extra government spending—can finance a new office for football-abstinence research called the Football-Use Center for Knowledge, or F.U.C.K. Off. for short. 

Sure, FU prohibition would merely force football to go underground, and this would spike crime rates, grow the deficit, pack prisons, separate families, reduce tax revenue, take away jobs, increase spending, remove safety protocols, enrich organized crime, burden state budgets, encourage racial profiling, promote policing for profit, create an illicit market, strip personal freedoms, stigmatize football fans, saddle hardworking Americans with criminal records, ignore the democratic will, distract law enforcement and prevent Mike Pence from taxpayer-funded publicity stunts. That's exactly what happened with cannabis prohibition (read about Pence and cannabis here), and if the federal government has allowed all this to continue for more than 80 years, it must be a worthy blueprint for instituting a prohibition on football. 

And football is worse than cannabis. Both have potential health risks, but only cannabis has medical benefits. Think of it this way: Cannabis has all of the good of Dr. Jekyll and all the evil of Mr. Hyde, but football is entirely the monster Hyde, the harmful effect of which cannot be measured. It's high time that America take this issue seriously and institute an FU prohibition because good people don't watch football. 

Photos by Stephen Baker and Martin Reisch. 

lovelytheband: "broken" Trio Strums Catchy Tunes about Mental Anguish

Guess What Didn't Make the Top 15 Drug Overdose List

Kentucky Racehorse Busted for CBD

New Studies Reveal How Cannabis Can Treat Different Types of Pain

That Time Scientists Blasted Peyote Prohibitionists

Dear Culturalist: Why the New Obsession with Terpenes

Go Cross-Country with Keith Haring

The Atrium Welcomes Luxury and Wellness to Retail

Alex Simon Knows How to Make Good Choices

Midterm Madness: These States Lit Up the Vote

What Happens when Scientists Give Psychedelics to Animals?

The Rise of Psychedelic Psychotherapy

PRØFILES | System of a Down's Shavo Odadjian | Part 2

I Tried Tomato Wine and Lost

9 Halloween Costumes That Will Definitely Offend